Florida Consumer Sentiment Drops in February

 Floridians’ opinions about current economic conditions were mixed. Their views of future economic conditions are more pessimistic, a UF analysis found.

GAINESVILLE, Fla. — After three consecutive months of increases following the presidential election, consumer sentiment among Floridians dropped 2.6 points in February, down from a revised figure of 86.9 in January. National sentiment stands out with a sharp decline of seven points.

“The decline in consumer sentiment is primarily driven by Floridians’ pessimistic expectations about future economic outlooks, which have decreased for the second consecutive month. In particular, expectations for the U.S. economy dropped sharply, nearly reversing the gains seen since the presidential election in November,” said Hector H. Sandoval, director of the Economic Analysis Program at UF’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research.

“Several factors are contributing to this growing pessimism, with the potential impact of tariffs likely at the top of the list, particularly through their effect on prices. This has led to higher inflation expectations. While tariffs on Canada and Mexico were postponed in February, they are now expected to take effect in March. Tariffs on China were imposed in February, and further increases are under consideration. Additionally, inflation remains above the Fed’s target, delaying any prospects of interest rate cuts in the near future,” Sandoval added.

Among the five components that make up the index, four decreased and one increased. Floridians’ opinions about current economic conditions were mixed. Opinions of personal financial situations now compared with a year ago increased 5.5 points, rising from 62.6 to 68.1. These views were shared broadly across sociodemographic groups and were particularly strong among men and people aged 60 and over. In contrast, opinions on whether now is a good time to buy a major household item, such as an appliance, decreased slightly three-tenths of a point from 77.9 to 77.6. However, these views varied across sociodemographic groups, with men, people younger than 60, and people with an annual income above $50,000 expressing more favorable opinions.

Floridians’ views of future economic conditions in February forecast a pessimistic outlook, as all three components deteriorated substantially. Expectations of personal financial situations a year from now declined 3.9 points from 102.2 to 98.3. These negative views were shared by Floridians across sociodemographic groups, except for people with an annual income under $50,000, whose reading showed slightly more optimistic expectations. Outlooks of U.S. economic conditions over the next year experienced the steepest decline, plummeting 8.6 points from 96.5 to 87.9. Additionally, expectations of U.S. economic conditions over the next five years fell 5.8 points from 95.1to 89.3. Notably, these downward trends were observed across all sociodemographic groups.

“Federal civilian employment in Florida totals nearly one hundred thousand workers, but it is unclear how many will be affected by the recent layoffs. While the overall job market remains solid, job and wage losses among federal government employees could reduce demand and consumption, potentially affecting Florida businesses. Ultimately, the economic impact will depend on the scale of the job cuts and the ripple effect on contractors and consumer spending,” said Sandoval.

“Looking ahead, we anticipate a decline in consumer sentiment, driven by the potential for new tariffs and ongoing workforce reductions resulting from federal government layoffs. Consumer sentiment in March will offer further insight into whether this shift points to a longer-term downward trend in the months ahead,” said Sandoval.

Conducted Jan. 1 to Feb. 27, the UF study reflects the responses of 279 individuals who were reached on cellphones and 271 individuals reached through an online panel, a total of 550 individuals, representing a demographic cross section of Florida. The index used by UF researchers is benchmarked to 1966, which means a value of 100 represents the same level of confidence for that year. The lowest index possible is a two, the highest is 150.

Source: University of Florida

© 2025 Florida Realtors®

Understanding Florida's Transaction Broker Role

By Richard Swank

Florida law presumes brokers as transaction brokers unless a disclosure is made. This role allows limited representation, no fiduciary duty and limited confidentiality.

ORLANDO, Fla. — Florida law states that unless a residential real estate broker provides a single agent or no brokerage relationship disclosure to their customer, the broker is presumed to be a transaction broker. But what does that mean?

Transaction broker is defined in Section 475.01(1)(l), Florida Statutes. A transaction broker can represent a seller, a buyer or both in a real estate transaction but does not represent either in a fiduciary capacity. Accordingly, the seller and the buyer give up their rights to undivided loyalty from the licensee. The limited representation allows the licensee to facilitate the transaction, but the licensee cannot work to the detriment of one party over the other if representing both.

Section 475.278(2), Florida Statutes, sets forth the duties of a transaction broker. A transaction broker must deal honestly and fairly, account for all funds, use skill, care, and diligence and disclose latent defects. In addition, a transaction broker must present all offers and counteroffers in a timely manner, unless their customer has instructed otherwise in writing. 

Finally, a transaction broker has the duty of limited confidentiality. The limits in the statute include disclosing that a party will pay more or accept less than presented in the listing or offers, a party’s motivation, private details of financing and anything else the customer asks the broker to keep confidential.

When reviewing these duties, it’s important to note that some of them, such as the duty of dealing honestly and fairly and the duty of disclosing latent defects, are universal to all three of Florida’s brokerage relationships. Where a transaction broker differs from, for example, a single agent, is that the transaction broker doesn’t have a duty of loyalty and only a limited duty of confidentiality.

Some brokers ask, “I’m a transaction broker. Doesn’t that mean I represent the transaction?” As you can see from the statutory definition and duties, that answer is no.  A transaction broker represents either or both of the parties, but the broker does not represent the transaction. If the broker is representing both parties, the broker facilitates the transaction but does not represent it.

Though the nuances of transaction broker practice can be tricky, ultimately it provides a great deal of flexibility to a real estate broker. If the broker identifies a buyer, the broker can represent that buyer in the same transaction without additional disclosure paperwork. Transaction brokers should be mindful of complying with Article 7 of the National Association of Realtors®’ Code of Ethics, which requires disclosure and consent if the broker is receiving compensation from more than one party. But the representation of both parties in a transaction is presumed to be permitted as a transaction broker.

Finally, one word of caution: When representing themselves in a transaction, a broker cannot be a transaction broker. Almost by definition, a person will always have their own best interests at heart when buying or selling their own property. The presumption of being a transaction broker should not mislead a broker into forming a relationship with the other party and its inherent conflicts of interest.

Richard Swank is an Associate General Counsel for Florida Realtors.

Note: Information deemed accurate on date of publication.

© 2025 Florida Realtors®